logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2017.07.19 2017노622
위증교사
Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Sentencing sentencing on the gist of reasons for appeal

2. In order to prevent the Defendant from criminal punishment of singing-to-sing-sing-to-sing-sing-to-sing-sing-to-sing-sing-outing-sing-outing-sing-outing-outing-outing-outing-outing-outing-outing-outing-outing-outing-outing-outing-outing-outing-outing-outing-outing-outing-outing-outing-outing-outing-outing-outing-outing-outing-outing-outing-outing-outing-outing-outing-outing-outing-

However, at the above trial of the court of first instance, the defendant appeared to have been sentenced to a suspended sentence for ten months due to the crime committed by the defendant appearing as a witness at the court of first instance, and was detained in court, the appellate court's sentence became final and conclusive, and since the crime of this case is in a concurrent relationship between the crime of perjury and the crime of this case after Article 37 of the Criminal Act, equity should be considered at the same time with the judgment. The crime of this case is recognized to be identical to the legal interests infringed upon, and the defendant committed the crime of this case upon the request of G of the Association of Singing Practice, and upon the request of G of the Association of Sing Practice, (G confirmed a summary order as to the crime of which the defendant instigated the above evidence). The crime of this case appears to have been committed on the extension line of the sentence. The defendant's age, sex, environment, motive and means of the crime of this case, as well as the fact that there was no record of punishment other than the previous conviction of this case, the judgment of the court below is within reasonable scope of oral discretion.

arrow