Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,500,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, the Defendants did not pay the fine.

Punishment of the crime

On October 27, 2015, at the front of the D cafeteria located in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, around 22:10, the Defendants jointly returned to the Defendants, on the ground that: (a) on the front of the D cafeteria, the 112-report was sent, Defendant A, a police official belonging to the police station E District of the police station, the victim G (30 years old) and the victim G (30 years old) were sent back first; (b) Defendant A was able to take the head of the Victim F and walked with the victim’s head, walking the victim’s G head, walking his body with the two hand, pushed the victim’s broth; (c) Defendant B was hicked with the victim’s her head, hick his head, hicking his head, hicking his head, and hicking his wheel, and hicking his quif, hicking the victim’s bridge, etc., with the victim’s left hand.

As a result, the Defendants jointly interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers concerning the investigation of crimes and the maintenance of order, and at the same time, the Defendants committed the injury to the victim F in the part of wood that requires approximately one week medical treatment, and the injury to the victim G in the climatic base and tension that require approximately two weeks medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F and G;

1. A victim's photograph, or a copy of working place;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each medical opinion;

1. The Defendants of the pertinent legal provision on criminal facts: Articles 136(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of their official duties), Articles 2(2) and 2(1)3 of the former Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (Amended by Act No. 12896, Dec. 30, 2014); Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of joint injury)

1. Commercial concurrent defendants: Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants who choose to impose a sentence: Selection of a fine (the confession, the attitude of reflecting the depth of the commission, the degree of injury of the victimized police officers, and the agreement with the victimized police officers is that the above police officers were unable to punish the Defendants; Defendant B was the first offender; Defendant A was also subject to a fine on two occasions due to driving of alcohol, and there was no criminal record other than that of a fine on two occasions);

1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69 of the Criminal Act.