logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2014.12.23 2014고단3375
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months, by a fine of 3,00,000 won.

Defendant

B does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B opened a sexual traffic business establishment with the trade name of “D” from 7th floor in both weeks, a room to receive a massage, shower facilities and a locking room, etc., and Defendant A conspired to manage the said business and distribute profits generated from the said facilities to 1:1.

Defendant

A around 22:30 on March 27, 2014, around 27:22:30, received a total of 250,000 won from two customers, and arranged female employees E to engage in sexual intercourse in sequence with the said customers. From January 2014 to March 27, 2014, A received KRW 110,00 to KRW 130,00 from the unspecified number of customers at the said establishment, and arranged female employees to engage in sexual intercourse.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to commit acts such as arranging sexual traffic for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding E;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Copy of lease contract; and

1. On-site photographs;

1. Application of investigation reports (verification of profits from arranging sexual traffic and property subject to a claim for the preservation of additional collection);

1. Relevant Articles and 19(2)1 of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. - Defendant A: The choice of imprisonment - Defendant B: the choice of fine;

1. Detention in a workhouse - Defendant B: Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Confiscation - Defendants: Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act

1. Additional collection - Defendant A: Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic;

1. Defendant B: Defendant A [the scope of recommendations] for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act; Defendant A [the scope of recommendations] does not have a basic area (6-1-4 months and month) (6-1-4 months) (the commission, etc. of sexual traffic through the receipt, payment, etc. of business or prices) in the second category (the commission, etc. of sexual traffic) and the basic area (6-1-4 months) (the decision of the sentence] [the decision of the sentence] the confession of the crime

The Defendants are South Korea.

arrow