A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On January 27, 2014, at around 00:40, the Defendant: (a) reported that police officers, such as D, etc., who were assigned to the C police box of the Dasan Police Station, were under the influence of alcohol on the road of the Yansan Police Station in front of the Yansan Police Station; (b) sent to the site on the ground that, around 00:555 on the same day, the Defendant visited the said C police box to the effect that he was under the influence of alcohol; (c) visited the police officers of the said C police box to “whether he would interfere with his private life”; (d) visited the police officers of the said C police box to take measures to have the police officers return to Korea using the patrol vehicle; and (e)

1. On January 27, 2014, at around 03:25, the Defendant damaged public goods at the Yansan Police Station C police box located in the Yansan-si, Yansan-si, the Defendant: (a) took a bath for the foregoing reason to the police officers, such as the sloping F, etc., who were working there; and (b) took a view that “packer’s privacy is infringed upon; (c) shotf, etc., the Defendant destroyed the sloping police box, which was in the vicinity thereof.”

Accordingly, the Defendant damaged the entrance entrance of the rest room, which is the goods used by public offices, to the amount equivalent to 200,000 won of the repair cost, and to the amount equivalent to 50,000 won of the repair cost.

2. On January 27, 2014, at around 08:35, the Defendant sought again at the places indicated in paragraph (1), and expressed that “The police officers of the Yasan Police Station C police box affiliated with the Yasan Police Station, who had been working there, she saw him/her as “prising off. . . . Sheet fright,” and assaulted G to walk the fucks, such as G’s bucks, and fucks, five times in number.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the prevention, suppression and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of the defendant in the first trial record;

1. The police statement of G and H;

1. Written statements of D;

1. The application of CCTV photographs and statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 141 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense and Article 141 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the damage of goods for public use;