Text
Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,500,000.
The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On August 9, 2010, Defendant A appeared to take an oath as a witness of the above court’s 2008 Godan1508 (combined) fraud, etc. in the Busan District Court’s vice branch branch located in Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-si.
At the above date, at the place, the Defendant testified that “D has no fact to reply to the witness” to question “I have given the said money to the witness upon deposit of the money in the passbook.”
However, the facts showed that D had withdrawn the amount of 34 million won from E to the agricultural bank passbook, and the Defendant received this and delivered it to F.
B. The Defendant testified, at the above date, at the above location, that “I would not have participated in the instant case E” of the defense counsel, that “I would have participated in any part of the case in connection with the case,” and at that time, I testified that I would like to read “I would have participated in the instant case.”
However, the defendant was involved in the above case, such as introducing D to G in a loan fraud case against E, and finding money remitted from D to E, and delivering it to F by the owner of the loan to F.
As above, the Defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.
2. Around February 10, 2012, Defendant B’s non-guilty Defendant drafted and submitted a written complaint to Defendant B at the public service center of the Seoul Gangseo-gu Police Station located in Gangseo-gu Seoul, Gangseo-gu, Seoul, and a written complaint to A.
The following false complaints are included among the contents. In other words, in the case of the Busan District Court's Busan District Court's Branch Decision 2008Kadan1508 (Merger), fraud, etc. on August 9, 2010, the complainant (the defendant) did not borrow 7.5 million won from the defendant (A) as the intermediate payment of H apartment 401 in Bupyeong-si, the defendant (the defendant) did not trade with the defendant, and the purchase price of H apartment 401 in the above H apartment 401 is the bonds company.