Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On April 22, 2016, the Defendant: (a) at a construction site located in Ansan-si, Ansan-si; (b) on April 22, 2016, at the site located in Ansan-si; (c) the Defendant, while drinking alcohol together with the Defendant, prevents C from going on the track of the excavation searcher working there at that site, etc.; and (d) upon receiving a report from 112, the Defendant: (a) the chief of the police box in the Ansan-gu, Police Station D of Ansan-gu, Police Station called up upon the receipt of a report that C would escape disturbance; and (b) the Defendant, upon the receipt of the report, will bring C’s abnormal arms to E in order to arrest flagrant offenders as a result of interference with his/her duties; and (c) the Defendant, with

1. Assessment of tax base:

(zc) Loss; and

1. The tax base of, and the tax base of, the tax base of the tax base of the tax base of the tax base of the tax base of the tax base of the tax base of the tax base.

The Defendant continued to see E’s selling of defective E in which the police officer intending to load C by carrying on the patrol vehicle, while carrying “the value of the tax base” and “the value of the tax base of the tax base of the tax base of the tax base of the tax base of the tax base of the tax base of the tax base of the tax base of the tax base of the defendant.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in criminal investigations.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect C by the police;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of statutes on the photograph of the case

1. Relevant legal provisions for facts of crime, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act of the choice of punishment, selection of fines (the fact that the defendant acknowledges and reflects his mistake, that the defendant has no record of committing a crime exceeding the fine, and that the defendant has no record of committing a crime of violence since he was punished for a crime of violence around November 198, and that there has no record of being punished for a crime of violence until the crime of this case);

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;