beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment for 10 months, Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 5,000,000 won.
Defendant
B The above fine.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A is a dentist, and Defendant B is a dentist on May 15, 2013, who was sentenced to a suspended sentence of ten months by imprisonment for fraud at the Suwon District Court on October 15, 201, and the judgment has become final and conclusive on the 23th of the same month, and on April 2011, Defendant B is entrusted with the management diagnosis of H dental clinics conducted by the victim G under the name of Defendant A.
1. Defendant A shall not lend a dentist’s license to another person;
A. On October 11, 2010, the instant dental clinic located in the second floor of the Dagjin-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, under the condition that the said clinic would receive KRW 4 million per month from the victim G, lent its dentist’s license (license number J) to that condition.
B. On June 27, 201, at the same place, a dentist’s license was lent to a female under the condition that Defendant B receive KRW 4 million per month from Defendant B at the same place.
2. On June 13, 2011, the Defendants: (a) took advantage of the situation where the victim was unable to properly treat the obligees in the relation of demanding repayment; (b) closed down the above dental clinic; (c) prevented the victim from entering the above dental clinic; and (d) Defendant B from entering the above dental clinic; (c) given Defendant A a license fee of KRW 4 million per month to Defendant A; and (d) Defendant A had a new dental clinic established and operated by lending his/her dentist’s license to B; and (c) acquired and used the dental equipment owned by the victim by acquiring it.
On June 15, 2011, the Defendants conspired to allow the employees of the security firm to delete the records of the victim’s access authority stored in the electronic records of the location of the medical clinic, and subsequently interfered with the victim’s dental treatment by force by preventing the victim from accessing the clinic.
3. Although Defendant B is unable to establish a medical institution because it is not a medical person at the same place on July 1, 2011, Defendant B may not establish a dental clinic with the name of K dental clinic borrowed from Defendant A’s dentist’s license.