A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

[Criminal Justice] On February 10, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to three years of suspension of the execution of imprisonment for the crime of occupational breach of trust at the Jung-gu District Court on February 10, 201, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on May 26, 201.

【Criminal Facts】

The Defendant, through D, purchased a fishermen’s living countermeasure site (the so-called “stop” or “stopbbbbing area”) from E in connection with the Incheon Songdo Urban Development Project, but became aware of the damaged victim F.

Accordingly, the Defendant found the victim’s G with A around B, 2008, and found it to be “E” in the direction of “E” rather than filing a separate criminal complaint in Incheon, because of its own gue,” and even thereafter, the Defendant did not properly deal with a criminal case because there are many persons who find the victim several times and wanted to be in investigation agencies.

1. On March 2009, the Defendant of fraud and violation of the Attorney-at-Law Act made a false statement to the victim at the above G office located in Gangseo-gu Seoul Police Officer at the early 2009, stating that “In the Republic of Korea, the Deputy Prosecutor General of the Incheon Prosecutors’ Office is well aware, and E may be detained upon the request of the Deputy Prosecutor General for detention. In order to file a complaint, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that 50 million won is needed at work expense.”

However, even though the defendant was unaware of the Deputy Prosecutor General of the Incheon District Prosecutors' Office and received money from the victim, he did not have any intention or ability to make a request for the case.

The Defendant received from the victim the money of KRW 30 million on the 10th of the same month, in the name of one bank account (I) in the name of the Defendant for the purpose of soliciting the case, and KRW 20 million on the 19th of the same month.

As a result, the defendant received money and valuables under the pretext of soliciting the case that public officials handle at the same time by deceiving the victim.

2. On June 2009, the Defendant violated the Act on Fraudulent Conduct and Attorney-at-Law (hereinafter “Defendant”) was the head of the Incheon Prosecutors’ Office (hereinafter “E”) at the place above the Defendant’s wife on May 2009.

(2).