Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 2.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant and the victim C(Y, 59 years old) are neighboring land living in Handong.

The defendant operated on December 4, 2013 by the defendant around 10:00.

D In the case of a pension, the term “vegetable shall change the amount of KRW 300,000,000,000

The house shall be located in the house.

This money comes out of money in order to raise money.

It is intended to use money only by lending money and pay the money immediately.

“A false statement” was made.

However, even if the defendant borrowed money, he did not have the intention or ability to pay it normally.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received 3 million won from the victim to her husband E under the pretext of borrowing money.

In addition, on January 2014, the defendant extended 13:00 to 13:00 on the south of the People's Republic of Korea on the south of the People's Republic of Korea, "If there is no ground for funeral" in the ice festival chapter.

“A false statement” was made.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 1 million from the victim, who was in his seat, as a loan, from the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant obtained 4 million won through a total of two times and acquired it by fraud.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with respect to C and F;

1. Application of the provisions of Acts and subordinate statutes to detailed statements on transactions of entry and withdrawal, investigation reports (person G telephone communications);

1. Article 347 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The fact that the reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the victim did not pay damages to the victim is an unfavorable circumstance.

However, the fact that the defendant is recognized to commit the crime, the defendant has no record of the crime except for the past 20 years' probation, and the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive and background of the crime of this case, circumstances after the crime, and similar crimes are committed.