The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On September 2, 2015, around 12:30 on September 2, 2015, the summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant has a conflict between the victim B, who is an employee of the Defendant, and the Defendant, at a closed-ton office, a broadcasting equipment production company, which is located in 1002, with the digital A/S cost of the broadcasting equipment used by the Defendant, at around 12:0 of Geumcheon-gu Seoul, Geumcheon-gu, Seoul, as a matter of the broadcast equipment production industry, which is located in a closed-ton office, and the victim, among the president and employees C of the said company, who is the victim, has the age above her “Chewing f

In the sense of “the same bomb”, the victim openly insultingd the victim.

2. The instant case is an offense falling under Article 311 of the Criminal Act and may be prosecuted only upon a complaint under Article 312(1) of the Criminal Act.

According to the records, the victim may recognize the fact that he/she revoked the complaint against the defendant on February 25, 2016, which was after the prosecution of this case.

Therefore, the public prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act.