1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant B shall display 3, 4, 5, 6, and 3 of the attached Form 8 drawings among the 1st floor of the real estate listed in the attached list No. 1.

According to the evidence evidence Nos. 1 through 5, the plaintiff is a housing redevelopment improvement project association established to implement a housing redevelopment improvement project in the Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H Group, and the approval for the establishment of the association on September 15, 2009, and the approval for the implementation of the project on October 30, 2014, respectively, and the head of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government approved and publicly notified the management and disposal plan on November 19, 2015, and the defendants are the lessees possessing real estate in each of the above redevelopment improvement project zones.

The main text of Article 49(6) of the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (hereinafter “Urban Improvement Act”) provides that “When the authorization of a management and disposal plan is publicly announced, the owners, superficies, leasers, etc. of the previous land or buildings may not use or profit from the previous land or buildings until the date of the public announcement of relocation under Article 54.” Thus, the fact that the head of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government publicly announced the authorization of the management and disposal plan concerning the instant rearrangement project on November 19, 2015 is as seen earlier, the Defendants, who are the lessees of the real estate located within the execution zone of the instant rearrangement project, are obligated to deliver each of the possession real estate to the Plaintiff, who

Defendant G and F alleged to the effect that they cannot respond to the Plaintiff’s claim until the compensation for losses under the Act on the Acquisition of Land, etc. for Public Works and the Compensation therefor is completed. However, according to the respective descriptions of evidence Nos. 7 and Nos. 8 (including each number), the Plaintiff’s assertion of Defendant G and F is deemed to have completed the agreement with Defendant G, F, and the compensation for goodwill.

The plaintiff's claim is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.