A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 16, 2015, the defrauded of the borrowed money Defendant is obliged to pay KRW 20 million to the victim C, who is a branch in the mutual infinite-dong, Seocheon-dong, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, with the limit of KRW 20 million “on the loan of KRW 20 million, he/she shall be obliged to receive around March 2016.

1. As seen, the Plaintiff made a false statement to the effect that the Plaintiff was “.”

However, in fact, the Defendant was unable to receive the fraternity payment due to the fact that he joined a large number of occasions and received the fraternity payment and paid the fraternity payment, and thus, the Defendant was unable to receive the fraternity payment around March 2016. Since he did not have any intent or ability to make the said payment because he did not have any intention or ability to make the said payment because he had any obligation equivalent to approximately KRW 400 million without any particular property.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and transferred KRW 1,58,00 to the Saemaul Treasury account in the name of the defendant through D, which is the seat of the victim on the same day from the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

2. On January 2016, the Defendant was admitted to the “F” coffee shop operated by the Victim C at the Seocho-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Gyeongnam-gun, the Defendant is to faithfully pay the full amount of the remainder of the accounts even if he first purchased the accounts. The Defendant subscribed to the 4/4 unit No. 1/4 unit No. 6, and 1/2 unit No. 1/6.

1. As seen, the Plaintiff made a false statement to the effect that the Plaintiff was “.”

However, at the time, the Defendant joined a large number of occasions and received the fraternity, and thereby was able to “refiscing” the term “refiscing the previous debt,” and there was no intention or ability to pay the entire amount of the fraternity as above, since he was liable for the debt amounting to approximately KRW 400 million without any particular property.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and, under the pretext of guidance from the victim, he was transferred to the community credit cooperative account in the name of the defendant on January 4, 2016, and KRW 5 million on March 1, 2016, and KRW 16 million on March 1, 2016, respectively.