The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The judgment of the court below that found the defendant guilty on the ground that the defendant, although he did not have smoked at the date and place specified in the facts charged in the instant case, was led to the confession by the investigative agency, was erroneous

B. The sentence of the judgment of the court below on unreasonable sentencing (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The Defendant stated that the police, the prosecution, led to the confession of the instant crime from the hemp to the original trial court, and made a false confession by deception by the investigative agency. The smoking of the hemp was consistent with the date and time indicated in the facts charged, but there is no fact that the hemp was smoked at the place of the instant crime. As such, in particular, the Defendant’s confession statement appears to have credibility and discretionaryness of the confession made in the prosecutor’s office and the court below’s judgment as to the credibility or voluntariness, and the Defendant’s confession statement made by plucking, plucking, and keeping marijuana in the vicinity of the E fishing place on October, 201, in the vicinity of the E fishing place as of the date and time indicated in the facts charged.

Therefore, we cannot accept the defendant's assertion that the investigative agency, by deceiving the defendant, made a false confession in the investigative agency or the court of original instance.

B. The part of the inappropriate sentencing is based on the fact that the defendant had a record of being punished as previous and previous, and that the defendant committed the crime in this case during the repeated crime period due to the same criminal act, that the defendant denies and does not oppose the crime in the trial, that there is no change in circumstances that may be judged differently from the original judgment, and that there is no other similar case.