Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

No one shall knowingly receive any divulged personal information for profit or for any other wrongful purpose.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as if he viewed multiple representative terminals using the screen division function of the Defendant’s sales, advertised the Defendant’s red flass (flass that an acting driver who has joined multiple companies may receive prompt caller than competitors) on behalf of driving engineers, etc., and sells them. Program Blass, having a function to automatically write off a large amount of NAV ID and password on the NAV on its Internet website, “I”. On February 13, 2017, in order to enter the above program and send a printed book, the Defendant, at around 706, 507, Namyang-si, Seoul Special Metropolitan City (see seized X, e-mail, e-mail, e-mail, e-mail, 300 won or 605 won, e-mail, e-mail, 5050 won or 605 won, e-mail, e-mail, or 605 won, e-mail, etc.).

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each internal investigation report (the attachment of data by a purchaser of a malicious program, a copy of a request for provision of communications data and response data), each investigation report (the attachment of forwarding documents, the attachment of relevant persons, including statements and investigation matters, and the frequency of confidential letters of a suspect with no name specified as the suspect);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquiries, such as criminal history;

1. Article 71 (1) 6 and Article 28-2 (2) of the Act on Promotion of the Utilization of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, Etc., concerning facts constituting an offense, the choice of a fine, and the selection of a fine;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is examined, and the defendant recognized the criminal facts of this case and reflects his mistake, and the number of personal information provided by the defendant is relatively relatively.