A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Of the facts charged in the instant case, the charge of intrusion on a structure is acquitted.

Punishment of the crime

[2017 Highest 4299] Defendant has been taking charge of management of orders and funds to work as a director of the victim C corporation from June 2015.

1. Around December 30, 2015, the Defendant used a total of KRW 66,010,000,000 for 17 times in total, as shown in attached Table 1 year to August 9, 2016, when he/she kept funds deposited in the account of an enterprise bank in the name of the Defendant for a victim, which was managed in the manner of depositing funds from the victim’s office located in Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government in order to use them as funds for the management of the company, while he/she transferred the funds deposited in the account of an enterprise bank in the name of the Defendant to another account in the name of the Defendant on the same day.

Accordingly, the defendant embezzled the victim's property.

2. The Defendant used as a corporate passbook to maintain the ratio of equity capital at the victim’s office as described in paragraph (1) around November 27, 2015, in relation to business embezzlement related to the amount of custody of corporate bank accounts in the name of C Co., Ltd.

C During the business custody of a corporate bank account in the name of a corporation for the victim, it used 1,013,000 won for personal goods of the defendant from the account to the personal price of the defendant. From around that time to February 24, 2016, it used 218,350,350 won in total for four times, such as 21 to 4 minutes of the daily list of crimes in attached Form 2.

Accordingly, the defendant embezzled the victim's property.

[2018 Highest 972]

3. The defendant who damages property is registered as a director of a C Co., Ltd., and the victim E is registered as the representative director of the said C.

On November 2016, the victim filed a complaint with the Defendant for occupational embezzlement by stating that “the Defendant embezzled the funds of C Co., Ltd.”, and then replaced the digital fishing village of the said C Office.