The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below (two years and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The crime of this case is determined by the Defendant’s crime of this case, spawned down his residence, and setting fire to the floor of the victim’s dwelling, and the risk of the crime is not less than that of the Defendant.

한편 피고인이 한 때 내연관계에 있었던 피해자의 집에 다른 남자가 있는 것을 보고 화가 나 우발적으로 이 사건 범행을 저지른 것으로 보이는 점, 피고인이 불을 붙인 후 스스로 불을 껐고 경찰에 신고를 하기도 한 점, 피고인이 잘못을 반성하고 있는 점, 당심에 이르러 피해자가 피고인에 대한 처벌을 원하지 않는다는 의사를 표시한 점, 동종 범죄 또는 벌금형보다 무거운 형으로 처벌받은 전과가 없는 점, 그 밖에 피고인의 연령, 성행, 환경, 이 사건 범행의 경위, 범행 후의 정황 등 여러 가지 양형조건들을 종합적으로 고려하여 보면, 원심의 형은 다소 무거워서 부당하다.

Therefore, the defendant's argument is justified.

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the court below is reversed pursuant to Article 364(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the defendant's appeal is with merit.

The criminal facts and the summary of the evidence recognized by the court are all the same as the facts of the judgment below, and thus, they are invoked as they are in accordance with Article 369 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 164 (1) of the Criminal Act (the occupation of the present main building and fire prevention, the choice of limited imprisonment), and Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act (the occupation of intrusion and the choice of imprisonment);

1. From among concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act (within the scope of adding up the long-term punishments specified in the principal building or fire-fighting with heavier punishment) to the concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Suspension of execution;