logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.10.26 2017누55307
업무정지처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

The court's explanation of this case is consistent with the reasoning of the first instance judgment, except for the modification of "46 million won" of the fourth 16th 16th son of the first instance judgment "4,00,000 won" as "44,000 won," and therefore, it is acceptable in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(1) The court below's decision rejecting the plaintiff's assertion based on the evidence submitted by the court of first instance is justified, and the part of Gap evidence No. 11 and witness E, which correspond to the plaintiff's argument, are not sufficient to recognize the plaintiff's assertion, and the part of Gap evidence No. 11 and witness E's testimony, which correspond to the plaintiff's argument, are not believed in light of the evidence of the court of first instance. Thus, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit. Since the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, since the plaintiff's appeal is without merit, it is dismissed as it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow