beta
Text
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1...
Reasons
1. The basic facts of the claim: (a) the Plaintiff, a distributor of steel products, etc., entered into a contract with the Defendant to supply steel products to the Defendant on or around May 2016 on the condition of receiving payment on the last day of the month following the month when the goods were supplied (hereinafter “instant contract”); and (b) the Plaintiff under the instant contract, as designated by the Defendant, entered into a “C New Construction Project” (the National Pension Corporation ordered and contracted to supply steel products, and among which, construction of reinforced concrete was carried out (hereinafter “Tun Construction”).
(3) On May 2016 to July 2016, 2016, the Defendant supplied 7,581,200 won (i.e., the sum of 7,581,200 won) from the end of May 2016 to the end of July 2016, and (ii) signed the Plaintiff’s receipt of the goods at the bottom of the “Detailed Statement of Transactions,” which was delivered by the Plaintiff on each delivery date, and issued three copies of the tax invoice to the Plaintiff at the request of the Defendant. (iii) The Plaintiff issued three copies of the tax invoice to the Plaintiff at the request of the Defendant on July 2016. (iv) However, the Plaintiff did not have any contact with the Defendant on the supply of the goods in the instant contract or the instant tax invoice, and (v) the fact that the construction was closed on or around April 2017, without paying the said goods, does not conflict between the parties, or there is no evidence to prove any number of evidence and evidence attached to each of subparagraphs 1, 2, and 3 (including evidence).
2. (1) According to the above facts of recognition as to the Plaintiff’s claim, the Defendant, as a party to the contract of this case, is a total of KRW 7,581,200, and the date following the date of delivery of a copy of the complaint of this case sought by the Plaintiff, as a party to the contract of this case, is the end of the following month of each supply date, and thus, the payment for each of the above goods is delayed.