logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원동부지원 2015.09.25 2015가단3022
제3자이의 소
Text

1. The plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

The plaintiffs asserted that the real estate stated in the attached list is owned by the plaintiffs' mother, and the defendant's mother is the defendant's debtor as the defendant's mother. Considering the purport of the whole argument in the statement in the evidence No. 2, the execution officer E belonging to the Busan District Court's Dong branch branch of the Busan District Court on June 24, 2014, the execution officer Eul, who was the plaintiff's father and the husband of Eul, paid a notarial deed No. 441 of 2013 to the above court as the title of execution under the title of title 2014No. 1695 of the above court. On the same day, it can be recognized that the corporeal movables were delivered with the above corporeal movables by receiving the proceeds of sale from D. However, even if the movables acquired by the corporeal auction belong to the third party's possession and possession, execution cannot be deemed to be null and void as long as compulsory execution is completed, and in addition to the above legal reasoning, the above corporeal movables's ownership and possession right to it cannot be deemed to continue to exist (see the above judgment.

Therefore, the plaintiffs' assertion is without merit.

arrow