1. The Defendant’s KRW 13,877,589 with respect to the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from October 8, 2013 to September 22, 2017.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. Fact 1) The Plaintiff is a person working as a road repair worker in B’s repair division, and the Defendant is a C10 tons train (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).

(2) On October 8, 2013, around 11:14, 2013, the Plaintiff was a mutual aid business entity that entered into a mutual aid agreement with respect to the vehicle. (2) Around 11:14, at a point where Dwork Vehicles (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiffs”) was stopped on the side at approximately 1.6 km from the front side of the Jinbuk-gu, Changwon-si, Masan-si, the south coast, along the southwest side of the Jinbuk-gu, and was on board the vehicle after collecting fallens away from the edge of the road, and then putting them on the vehicle. However, the driver of the Defendant’s vehicle, who was at the next time, neglected the driver’s duty of front-time, led the Plaintiff’s left side of the vehicle to the front side of the Defendant’s vehicle. Accordingly, the Plaintiff suffered injury, such as the Plaintiff’s alley executive pelf and the upper side of the front side of the vehicle.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). B.

Judgment

According to the above facts, since the accident of this case occurred due to the negligence of the driver of the defendant vehicle, the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiff for the damage caused by the accident of this case.

C. Whether the liability is limited or not, the driver of the Plaintiff’s vehicle shall stop on the side of the road and shall not obstruct the passage of the vehicle driving on the two-lane while stopping the vehicle on the side of the road in order to remove the waste rail, etc. coming down on the road. In addition, the Defendant did not take such measures so that the driver of the vehicle driving on the two-lanes can easily understand the vehicle at a distance of not less than 100 meters away from the front side of the vehicle, while installing a sign informing that the vehicle is working on the side of not less than 10 meters away from the front side of the vehicle, and the Plaintiff is negligent

However, it is difficult to view the Plaintiff’s negligence solely on the ground that the Plaintiff was on board the Plaintiff’s vehicle for work, and the Defendant’s above assertion is without merit.