A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

A. On July 18, 2015, the Defendant is granted from Hyundai Construction Co., Ltd. the right to sprinks, soil and sand transport, operation right, etc. related to the above construction as the victim E at the D cafeteria located in Macheon-si, Macheon-si, and directly subordinate to the G Construction Co., Ltd.

The dump truck's 20 pump truck's right to transport 20 pump truck is a good condition to make its investment, and if so, it can raise high profit equivalent to 12.8 billion won during the construction period for 7 years.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, at the time of Hyundai Construction Co., Ltd., the Defendant did not have been granted the above right of wood, earth and sand transport, and the right of operation, so even if he received an investment from the injured party, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to reduce the right of soil and sand transport.

The Defendant, as such, had attempted to receive investment money by deceiving the victim, but the victim suspected of such deception had refused to do so.

B. On September 2015, the Defendant was granted the victim’s authority, such as the F Vice president, G development business, Hyundai Construction Co., Ltd., with the right to use booms, and the right to operate booms, at the Kelel operated by the victim J. I, which was located in the middle-time police.

If 100 million won is invested in B, dump truck 10 million won is invested in 200 million won, dump truck will be allowed to transport 20 dump truck.

dump truck 10 kump truck may be punished with an amount equivalent to KRW 6.4 billion for seven years during the construction period of the territorial sea.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, at the time of Hyundai Construction Co., Ltd., the Defendant did not have been granted the above right of wood, earth and sand transport, and the right of operation, so even if he received an investment from the injured party, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to reduce the right of soil and sand transport.

The Defendant, as such, deceiving the victim and attempted to receive the investment money, but suspected of causing damage.