The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below (one year of imprisonment) on the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The Defendant appears to have prevented the instant crime because of the economic difficulties at the time, and the Defendant’s profit gained by mediating or operating an illegal game room without the running period of the illegal game room.

The fact that it is difficult to see, that there is no good health condition of the defendant, that there is a penmatic error, and that he reflects it is favorable for the defendant.

However, the defendant had a record of being punished by a fine due to other crimes, and repeatedly committed the crime of this case during the period of the suspended sentence even though he was punished by the same crime, and the defendant has repeatedly committed the crime of this case during the period of the suspended sentence, and the defendant has actively prevented the crime of this case, such as providing the head of the illegal game which was leased in advance to C and receiving the fees therefor. In addition, the defendant also committed the crime of exchanging the points obtained by many unspecified customers in cash while installing 40 game machine with non-classified game products and operating the illegal game room, and the crime is not good. The crime of this case's illegal game room business is not good. The illegal game room business in this case's promotion of excessive speculative spirit to many unspecified people and impairing their sound work awareness, and thus, a more severe punishment is required. Nevertheless, the defendant, despite the fact that the defendant, in advance, had an employee I conduct the illegal game room for a long time to avoid criminal punishment, and had the defendant escape for a limited period of time (in relation to the crackdown of this case, the defendant's punishment of this case's excessive confession.