1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 7,00,000 with respect to the Plaintiff and 5% per annum from November 28, 2015 to July 6, 2016.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. Each entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4 (including paper numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), Gap evidence No. 6, Eul evidence No. 7, Eul evidence No. 1, and Eul evidence No. 2 can be acknowledged as follows in full view of the whole purport of the pleadings. Contrary to this, some of Gap evidence No. 6, Gap evidence No. 7, Eul evidence No. 1, and Eul evidence No. 2 are likely to believe, and there is no counter-proof otherwise.

(1) The Plaintiff and Defendant C are the same students of D High School, and Defendant B is the same as that of Defendant C with Defendant C, and from July 2014, the Plaintiff and Defendant B knew from Defendant C to Defendant C.

(2) Following the creation of the Plaintiff, the Defendants discussed the plan for Defendant B to engage in sexual intercourse with the Plaintiff. On July 24, 2014, around 24:00, Defendant C served the Plaintiff at the alcohol house with the Plaintiff as the Plaintiff.

(3) After that, Defendant C took place on the job as planned in advance, and Defendant B attempted sexual intercourse with the Plaintiff who was under the influence of alcohol by burning the Plaintiff on the telecom and driving the Plaintiff on the telecom. However, it did not reach the wind of the Plaintiff’s refusal to do so and leaving the telecom.

B. According to the above facts of recognition, Defendant B committed an indecent act by force against the Plaintiff, and Defendant C aided and abetted Defendant B’s indecent act by force.

Therefore, the defendants are jointly and severally liable to compensate for the damages suffered by the plaintiff due to the above illegal acts as joint illegal acts.

2. Scope of damages liability

A. As to the claim for mental and medical expenses, the Plaintiff claimed that the Plaintiff should pay the medical expenses to the Plaintiff as compensation for damages, the Defendants asserted that the medical expenses should be paid as compensation for damages. Accordingly, in light of the overall purport of the arguments in the statement in No. 4-1 to No. 5, the Plaintiff was found to have received mental and medical treatment after the tort in this case, and there is no counter-proof.