logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2018.06.22 2018고단86
근로기준법위반
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is an employer who employs nine full-time workers and engages in construction business, etc. as a person who actually operates a limited-liability agricultural company C in the Jeju-do.

Defendant Company did not pay KRW 1,325,00 (E), 945,00 (F), and G used as a penalty mold from July 1, 2016 to July 14, 2016, with the construction site located in Seopoposi City, 201 to June 21, 2016, with the amount of KRW 1,325,00 (E), 945,00 (F), and with the amount of KRW 2,945,00 (G), 2,850,000 (H), total of KRW 8,065,00,000 from the date of payment agreement between the parties to the extension of the payment period, within 14 days from the date of retirement, respectively, without the agreement between the parties to the payment.

2. Determination

(a) Applicable legal provisions: Articles 109(1) and 36 of the Labor Standards Act;

(b) Crimes of non-violation of Intention: Article 109 (2) of the Labor Standards Act;

C. The employee’s written withdrawal of each complaint, stating his/her intent to not punish the Defendant, is submitted (H on May 29, 2018, E, F, and G)

(d) Judgment dismissing public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;

arrow