logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2017.08.09 2017고단320
업무상과실치사등
Text

Defendant

A A Fine of 6,00,000 won, Defendant B of 4,000,000 won, Defendant C of 2,000 won, and Defendant C of 2,00.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A Co., Ltd. is a company established on October 16, 2009 for the purpose of having its head office in Pyeongtaek-si E and manufacturing plastic raw materials. Defendant A is a real representative of the above company, who takes overall charge of safety and health affairs for workers working in the above company, and Defendant B is an employee of the above company.

1. Defendant A

A. On November 1, 2016, the Defendant violated the Victim F’s occupational duties, death and injury, and Industrial Safety and Health Act with respect to the Defendant: (a) around November 15:30, 2016, at the workplace of the said C Co., Ltd., the victim F (63 tax) (a person who works for the said company) had the victim F (63) move the waste safety net selected from the night.

In such a case, the defendant, who is a general manager of safety and health affairs for the employees under his control, has a duty of care to prevent the collision between the vehicle's moving route and the place where the employee works in preparation for the risk of collision between the employee and the employee, by clearly separating the course of the vehicle's moving and the place where the employee works in his own moving path, and by preventing the occurrence of the employee's work in his own moving path, has a duty of care

Nevertheless, the defendant did not clearly distinguish the moving route of the vehicle to be placed in the above workplace and the work space of the worker, and the occupational negligence that did not place a conductor or an guide in moving the vehicle to be placed in the operation of the vehicle to be used by the defendant, and the defendant did not find the victim in the field of the vehicle in front of the machinery in the above workplace, and did not find the victim in the field of the vehicle in front of the machinery in the above workplace, and shocked the victim in the right side of the vehicle in front of the above fork to the victim.

Ultimately, the defendant's negligence in the above occupational negligence and the occupational negligence in B, such as Paragraph 3, are jointly involved, and the victim is at Pyeongtaek-si G around 16:00 on the same day.

arrow