A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On January 15, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of two million won for the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Gwangju District Court on August 31, 2010, and sentenced to a fine of three million won for the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the wooden Branch of the Gwangju District Court on August 31, 2010. On September 6, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of six million won for the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the wooden Branch of the Gwangju District Court on September 6, 2013, and violated Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act at least twice.

1. On March 28, 2014, at around 21:43, the Defendant was driving a B low-speed car while under the influence of alcohol of about 0.168% of alcohol content without obtaining a driver’s license in the section of about 2km from 122km-ro 122 large-scale 104, front to 104 large-scale 104 large-scale 104, to the front day of the modern parliamentary city.

2. On March 28, 2014, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Death or Injury caused by Dangerous Driving) driven the said B-H car with the blood alcohol concentration of 0.168% while under the influence of alcohol around March 28, 2014, and driven the three-lane front of the modern parliamentary origin in the speed of 264 at the length of Fapopo City, along two-lanes from the direction of Fapo Police Station to the direction of Fapo City.

At night and at night, signal lights are installed on the front door, so in such cases, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to reduce the speed to those engaged in driving, and to ensure the well-being of other vehicles in the signal and the front door, and to prevent the accident in advance.

However, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol so that the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol without putting a speed at a proper view, and the Defendant was under the same direction, and then discovered that the Daren car car of the victim C (the age of 33) driven ahead of the same direction was under a stop signal and took a sudden action, but the Defendant was not under the influence of alcohol, but under the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle.