logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.11.02 2017고정124
사기등
Text

Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3 million and by a fine of KRW 5 million, respectively.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendants and D paid the insurance premium for Defendant D and Defendant A as if they were F employees, even though they did not have engaged in private search business and did not have engaged in any work at the workplace of the trade name called “F” in Gwangju Northern-gu E and 207dong 909.

1. On September 4, 2015, Defendants B submitted an application for recognition of eligibility for unemployment benefits containing false details that Defendant A retired while serving in F from May 2, 2014 to August 30, 2015 to Defendant B, and Defendant A accordingly received transfer of KRW 6,114,100 from the victim of the Republic of Korea (Ministry of Labor) on September 18, 2015 from that time until February 11, 2016, including transfer of KRW 326,080 from the victim of the Republic of Korea (Ministry of Labor).

As a result, the Defendants conspired to deceive the victim of unemployment benefits by deceiving him/her, and received unemployment benefits by fraud or other improper means.

2. On October 1, 2015, Defendant B and Defendant B submitted to a public official in charge of the victim of the Republic of Korea (employment Ministry of Labor) on a written application for recognition of eligibility for unemployment benefits containing false details that D was discharged from F while serving in the Republic of Korea from May 2, 2014 to September 23, 2015, and D accordingly received a remittance of KRW 34,000 from the Republic of Korea (employment Ministry of Labor) on October 15, 2015 from that time to February 4, 2016, five times in total, as shown in Table 2 of the List of Crimes in the attached Table 2.

As a result, Defendant B conspired with D to obtain unemployment benefits by deceiving the victim, and at the same time received unemployment benefits by fraud or other improper means.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The witness A’s partial legal statement (as to Defendant B), and the witness D’s partial legal statement;

1. Application for recognition of each eligibility for benefits;

1. A.

arrow