logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2020.06.22 2020고단1359
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of eight million won.

When the defendant does not pay a fine, one hundred thousand won shall be converted into one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in small-scale taxi driving service B.

On October 19, 2019, the Defendant driven a taxi at around 06:10 on October 19, 2019, and got off the intersection in front of the D convenience points located in Bupyeong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Incheon, after getting off the passenger from the side of the Ero to the right-hand left-hand.

Since a crosswalk is installed on the front side, the defendant was found to have a duty of care to safely drive the crosswalk, such as reducing speed and checking the right and the right of the road well, and when a pedestrian passes the crosswalk, he was obliged to temporarily stop in front of the crosswalk so as not to obstruct crossing or endanger it.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and neglected to do so, and neglected to do so, received the victim F (the age of 62) who dried the crosswalk in accordance with the pedestrian signals by negligence, and received the part of the victim F (the age of 62) who dried the crosswalk in front of the taxi.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as the 12 weeks of medical treatment due to the occupational negligence above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3(1) and the proviso to Article 3(2)6 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the relevant criminal facts, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act (to be punished by a fine in consideration of the circumstances, etc. in which a vehicle driven by a defendant was admitted to the G Financial Cooperative and thus, the defendant agreed with the victim at the stage of investigation, reflecting his/her mistake and mistake;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

arrow