1. The defendant

A. Plaintiff A: KRW 9,630,880; KRW 10,119,420 to Plaintiff B; KRW 43,989,350 to Plaintiff C; and Plaintiff D. 28.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Business approval and public announcement - Business name: R-Housing redevelopment improvement project (hereinafter referred to as “instant rearrangement project”): Defendant - Public announcement of business approval: Public announcement of the Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government approval of project implementation for RR redevelopment improvement project on January 17, 2013;

B. Decision on expropriation made on November 25, 2016 by the local Land Tribunal of Seoul Special Metropolitan City: The object of expropriation is as described in the item of “subject matter of expropriation” in the attached Table 1.

(hereinafter referred to as “subject matter of expropriation in this case”) . - The starting date of expropriation: January 13, 2017 - Compensation: Each entry in the item of “compensation for adjudication of expropriation” in the attached Table 1.

- An appraisal corporation: An appraisal corporation and a general appraisal corporation;

C. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on November 23, 2017 - Compensation for losses: Each entry in the item of “compensation for objection” in the attached Table 1.

- An appraisal corporation: A certified public appraisal corporation, a certified public appraisal corporation (based on recognition), a corporation in charge of the settlement of disputes (based on recognition), a certificate referred to in subparagraphs 1 through 8 (excluding a case where the number is included, hereinafter the same shall apply), and a statement in subparagraphs 1 through 7 and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The amount of compensation for objection against the subject matter claimed by the Plaintiffs cannot be deemed a reasonable amount of compensation. The court’s appraisal (the Plaintiff filed an application for preservation with the Seoul Administrative Court on October 11, 2017 to seek market value assessment of the subject matter to be expropriated, and the said appraisal has already been conducted in the above preservation case (the Seoul Administrative Court 2017da126388) (the “court appraisal” refers to both the appraisal in the above preservation case) sought the payment of additional compensation corresponding to the difference between the reasonable amount of compensation for the subject matter to be expropriated and the amount of compensation for the said ruling).

Furthermore, the payment of each residential relocation cost, director cost, and resettlement subsidy for the plaintiff E and L is sought.

B. Judgment 1 Plaintiffs.