The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. misunderstanding of facts or misunderstanding of legal principles (the selection of a management entity specialized in improvement projects without a general meeting resolution) was a prior procedure to select a management entity specialized in improvement projects at a general meeting of its members, and the Defendant entered into a provisional contract for mobilization technology of a stock company and management entity specialized in improvement projects, and did not have concluded this contract, but the lower court found the Defendant guilty of this part of the facts charged. In so doing, the lower court erred by misapprehending the facts contrary to

B. Sentencing (the fact that the material recorded in an important meeting is not prepared or kept, and the member's failure to comply with the request for inspection or copying) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The Defendant and the defense counsel at the lower court asserted the same as the grounds for appeal of this case at the lower court, and the lower court rejected the Defendant’s assertion in detail on the grounds that the Defendant and the defense counsel at the lower court stated the same time as the grounds for appeal of this case. In line with the records, the lower court’s determination is just and acceptable, and there is an error of law by misunderstanding facts in violation of the rules of evidence or by misapprehending the legal principles on contracts, thereby adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

subsection (b) of this section.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

B. It is recognized that the Defendant’s wrongful assertion of sentencing (the fact that the Defendant did not prepare and keep material recording important meetings, the fact that the Defendant did not comply with the request for inspection and copying of union members) is divided into his/her misconduct, and that the Defendant did not have any particular criminal history other than that subject to suspended execution once as a crime of acquiring stolen property in around 1981.

However, housing redevelopment improvement project is proceeding for a long time and has various interests.