The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the above punishment for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. The lower court’s sentencing is too unreasonable on the grounds of appeal.

2. In light of the fact that the Defendant again committed the instant crime even if he/she had a previous record of multiple times, and that he/she has a high alcohol level during blood transfusion, strict punishment against the Defendant is necessary.

However, in consideration of the defendant's age, sex and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and other conditions of sentencing specified in the arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex and environment, motive and consequence of the crime, the defendant's punishment against the defendant is too unreasonable, and therefore, the above argument by the defendant is justified.

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the court below is reversed in accordance with Article 364(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the defendant's appeal is with merit, and the judgment below is ruled again as follows.

Criminal facts

The summary of the facts charged and the summary of the evidence recognized by the court is identical to the facts stated in the corresponding column of the judgment of the court below, and thus, they are quoted in accordance with Article 369 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant legal provisions and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the selection of punishment for a crime, and the selection of imprisonment;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;