logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2019.01.18 2017고단1995
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Justice] On June 10, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of interference with business, etc. in the Daejeon District Court’s Branch of the Daejeon District Court for the crime of interference with business, and on October 9, 2016, the Defendant completed the execution of the sentence.

【Criminal Facts】

“The Defendant, at around 21:00 on July 30, 2017, was unable to enter a soup 20 minutes of the total market price of the 1940,000 won and the cryr cryr cryr cryr cryr cryr cryr cryr cryr cryr cryr cryr cryr cryr cryr cryr cryr cryr cryr cryr cryr cryr cryr cryr cryr cryr cryr cryr cryr cryr cryr cryr cryr cryr cryr cryr cryr cryr cryr cryr e.

Accordingly, the Defendant damaged the property managed by the victim and interfered with the soup operation of the victim by force.

On October 18, 2017, the Defendant: (a) from around 09:00 to around 15:10 on October 18, 2017, at the “G’s convenience store for the operation of the Victim F, located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Incheon, for the victim without any reason under the influence of alcohol; (b) “I calculated why I would not buy tobacco”; (c) I am sound; and (d) I am a walk for about 6 hours by raising time to customers under the name of the non-member; and (d) raising him/her from the convenience store.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim's convenience store operation by force.

On September 1, 2018, the Defendant, around 07:44, the Seo-gu Standing Park in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju, about 07:7:2, within the investigation station and the detention room 2 rooms of Gwangju Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju, about September 1, 2018, 200 the total market price of public goods used for food distribution at the same place, which is equivalent to 60,000 won, was added.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the use of goods by public offices, thereby harming their utility.

Summary of Evidence

"2017 Highest 1995"

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. D's self-written statements;

1. On-site damage photographs;

arrow