1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant D’s KRW 111,143,566 and its related amount are 5% per annum from March 5, 2014 to August 25, 2015.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a party-related one) on August 28, 2013, the J-Credit Union (hereinafter “instant Union”).

(2) Defendant B, C, D, E, F, G, and H (hereinafter “Defendant’s officers and employees”) are officers and employees who were working in the instant association as follows, and Defendant Seoul Guarantee Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Seoul Guarantee Insurance Co., Ltd”) is the insurer who concluded an insurance contract for fidelity guarantee with the instant association as the Defendant’s officers and employees.

The term of office No. 1 B during the period of service from May 28, 2004 to February 19, 201, 201, the non-standing president C from February 19, 201 to August 28, 2013 from February 19, 201 to August 28, 201, 3D 3 non-standing president D from February 1, 2004 to September 30, 201 to December 13, 2010 to May 31, 2013 to the Vice-President 5 on November 20, 2004 to August 20 to August 15, 2013 to the non-standing president 6 G G on April 25, 190 to September 31, 2019 to September 31, 2019 to September 31, 2019.

B. The prosecutor of the National Credit Union Federation of Korea and the disciplinary action following it shall be the National Credit Union Federation of Korea (hereinafter “National Credit Union Federation of Korea”).

Around April 2010 and June 2010, the instant association conducted a comprehensive inspection on and around the instant association, and thereafter requested the instant association to take disciplinary measures against Defendant B, D, F, G, and H as follows. The first president B of the classification of disciplinary measures under the name of the position: (i) the failure to conduct the evaluation of collateral; (ii) the assumption of debt; (iii) the lack of interest reduction and exemption; and (iv) each supervisor of the non-management of cash disasters; (ii) the improvement of the handling of mortgage loans; (iv) the offender of the division in charge of domestic loans; (v) the reduction of the handling of mortgage loans; (v) the failure to conduct an evaluation of security; (vi) the extension of the lending period; (vi) the assumption of debt; and (vi) each actor in charge of the reduction and exemption of interest; and (ii) the lack of handling of an assistant in charge of non-management cash disasters; and (ii) the lack of handling of an assistant in charge of security loans within the scope of March 4.