logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2018.06.18 2018가단1444
건물인도 등
Text

1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) deliver the buildings listed in the separate sheet;

B. From January 1, 2017, the above-mentioned A

subsection (b).

Reasons

1. Indication of claim;

A. On November 21, 2016, the Plaintiff and the Defendant entered into a real estate lease agreement with regard to the buildings listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant building”) with a deposit of KRW 5,00,000,000 per annum, KRW 3,000,000 per annum, deposit money, and the rent payment date as of December 31, 2016, and from November 21, 2016 to December 31, 2017.

B. The Defendant paid only the deposit after entering into a real estate lease agreement, and even though he/she took profits from occupying and using the building of this case, he/she did not pay up to now the rent of KRW 3,00,000.

C. The Plaintiff expressed his/her intent to terminate the lease contract verbally to deliver the building without extending the lease contract with the Defendant if the demand for the payment of rent and the term of lease expires several times.

Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to deliver the building indicated in the attached list to the Plaintiff and pay the Plaintiff the rent or unjust enrichment equivalent to the rent of KRW 3,000,000 per annum from January 1, 2017 to the completion date of delivery of the said building.

2. Judgment by service (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act).

arrow