A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On November 6, 2013, the Defendant: (a) concluded a lease agreement with the Defendant’s dwelling located in Seo-gu, Daejeon; (b) around 36 months to lease the computer facilities, such as the sum of KRW 95 million (15,670, 200, 200, 2000, 200,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00,00,00).

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Part F of the protocol concerning the interrogation of the suspect against the defendant in the prosecution;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Complaints, lease agreements, acquisition certificates, and photographs of leased articles;

1. Statement of impossibility of provisional disposition of corporeal movables;

1. Written waiver of the leased object and written consent for removal;

1. Investigation report (to hear the statement of H excursion ship in charge of tallying) and examination report;

1. The application of investigative reports (to attach a recording file in the side of the effective capital and that of the person under command) and recorded records Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 355 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act [the scope of recommending punishment] 1 type (less than 100 million won) of Article 62-2 of the basic area [the decision of sentencing] / None [the person who is subject to special sentencing] / [the decision of sentence] unfavorable circumstances: The defendant signed and sealed the defendant himself / herself to enter into a lease contract; the victim company's person in charge of the defendant and the defendant entered into a lease contract; and the defendant's explanation of the terms and conditions of the lease contract from the above person in charge was based on the "record of recording" in which the facts are recorded.