A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Punishment of the crime

On March 2015, 2015, the Defendant visited the Defendant’s male-friendly house No. 13:00 to 16:00, and visited the Defendant’s male-friendly house No. 13 apartment No. 16:00, which was located in the wife-based apartment No. 2, the Defendant laid down a precious metal with the total market value of KRW 2.560,000 in total, including one, five fluorgs and one fluor, which was owned by the Victim E, by the mother of D.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. Protocol concerning the examination of suspect concerning F by the prosecution;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning D police statements;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting the crime, the reasons for sentencing choice of imprisonment;

1. Application of the sentencing criteria (the scope of recommending punishment) (the scope of punishment) basic area (six months to one year and six months) of the theft of general property; and

2. In light of the fact that the Defendant, who had been sentenced to punishment several times for the same crime, went again to commit the instant crime, and the nature of the crime is heavy, and the damage has not been recovered up to now, the Defendant’s sentence is inevitable.

In full view of the circumstances leading to the crime, the amount of damage of this case, circumstances after the crime, relationship between the defendant and the victim, age, character and conduct, etc., and all the sentencing conditions as shown in the arguments, the sentence shall be imposed as ordered.