1. The Defendant shall pay 138,006,780 won to the Plaintiff and 20% per annum from July 30, 2013 to the day of full payment.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff entered into a contract with the Defendant for the supply of food materials, such as silent, and supplied the Defendant with the aforementioned food materials from August 201 to June 2013.

B. The Defendant paid to the Plaintiff only KRW 480,202,100 out of KRW 618,208,880, and the remainder KRW 138,006,780 has not been paid up to now.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 8, 9, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination:

A. According to the fact that the Defendant’s obligation to pay the price of goods was recognized, the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff the amount of KRW 138,006,780, and damages for delay at the rate of 20% per annum under the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings from July 30, 2013 to the date of full payment, as the Plaintiff seeks.

B. The defendant's argument regarding the defendant's assertion that since the plaintiff's erroneous application of the unit price, quantity, etc. to the price of the goods claimed by the plaintiff exceeds the price of the goods to be actually paid by the defendant, the defendant's assertion that the amount of KRW 53,065,020, and the amount of KRW 58,820,000 suffered by the defendant because the plaintiff supplied food materials to the defendant and did not issue part of the tax invoice according thereto, the plaintiff's damage suffered by the defendant because he did not issue part of the tax invoice, and ③ since the plaintiff threatened the defendant several times while claiming for the price of the goods, 50,000 won

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the ground that the plaintiff's claim is reasonable.