1. All appeals against the instant principal lawsuit and counterclaim by the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be the principal lawsuit.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court citing the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, except for the addition of the following additional judgments, and thus, it is identical to the ground of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it is citing it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of

(2) The defendant's other grounds for appeal are not significantly different from the allegations in the first instance court, and as a result of the request for appraisal and supplementation of appraiser D for the first instance court, the fact-finding and determination in the first instance court are deemed to be justifiable even in view of the evidence No. 21 through No. 28, which the defendant submitted in the first instance court. There are no errors as alleged in the grounds for appeal by the defendant. The third 9 to 17 of the first instance court's judgment on February 2, 199 "(1) the remaining construction cost of the 7,452,00 won [1] 86,548,000 won - 86,5400 won [64,000 won - 64,000 won - 2,030,000 won - 2,000 won, 200,518,000 won [360 won, 205,000 won)] which the defendant paid the remaining construction cost to the plaintiff.

3. Additional determination

A. In the trial of the court, the construction cost of the reinforced block constructed by the defendant is included in the instant construction contract in relation to the stairs construction of the instant house, but since the plaintiff was not constructed, the construction cost of KRW 12 million should be additionally deducted from the remaining construction cost.