logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2020.09.09 2020고단2289
업무방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 6, 2020, the Defendant: (a) around 22:00, at the main point of “D” in the Victim C Management in Daegu Jung-gu, Daegu-gu, the Defendant: (b) took alcohol, and (c) took a heavy voice, such as “to her, her, her, her, her, her, abandoned her, and her,” and (d) took a bath to her employee E, “Chewing, her,” and (e) took a view of “her, her, her, her,” and (e) prevented customers from entering the said main point by exposing the disturbance, such as a series of her walls.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's main business by force.

2. At around 22:13 on the same day, the Defendant committed an assault against the Defendant’s inner part of a slope G on the ground that he was unable to immediately return the Defendant’s inner wall for identification verification from a slope G belonging to the F District District of the Daegu Middle Police Station, which was called upon by the Defendant, upon receiving a report that the Defendant was suffering from rioting, as described in paragraph (1) at the above main part of the same day.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the protection of the lives, bodies, and property of the police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement related to C and G;

1. 112 reported case handling table;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photograph CCTV images by capturing them;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of punishment, and the choice of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. 가납명령 형사소송법 제334조 제1항 양형의 이유 심야에 술에 취해 다른 주점에 쳐들어가 소란을 피우고 아버지뻘 되는 출동 경찰관의 급소 부위를 가격한 것이어서 가볍게 볼 수 없으나, 다행히 피해 경찰관이 크게 다치지 않은 점, 피고인이 고등학교 졸업식을 기념하기 위해 생애 처음으로 술을 마신 탓에 자신의 주량을 전혀 가늠하지 못한 채 과음한 것으로 보이고, 나중에...

arrow