1. The part against the defendant among the judgment of the court of first instance is revoked, and the plaintiff's claim corresponding to the revoked part is revoked.

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation on this part is as stated in the corresponding column of “1. Basic Facts” in the judgment of the court of first instance. Inasmuch as the reasoning for the court’s explanation on this part is the same as stated in the corresponding column of “1. Basic Facts” in the judgment of the court of first instance (However, (i) the 2nd 15 of the judgment of the court of first instance (hereinafter “instant contract”), adding “a part of the instant contract as a document attached thereto”; and (ii) adding “cost” to “387,957,920” in Chapter 3 of the judgment of first instance (hereinafter “the 4nd 3th 1st 3th 3th 3th 4th 4th 4th 1) and

2. The reasons why the court should explain this part of the judgment on the cause of the claim are as follows: ① the defendant added “A” under Section 5, Section 9 of the judgment of the court of first instance, and ② the date of pronouncement of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be read as “the date of pronouncement of the judgment of the court of first instance” under Section 5, Section 10 shall be read as “the date of pronouncement of the judgment of the court of first instance”; ③ The judgment of the court of first instance is the same as the corresponding column of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding the following judgments as to the newly alleged matters in Section 5, Section 12, and thus, it shall be cited as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article

[Supplementary Rule] 3) The plaintiff asserts that the defendant is obligated to pay 8,034,170 won for excess advance payment (24,420,300 won for the year 2015, which the defendant shall pay to the plaintiff - 16,386,130 won for the settlement of accounts in 2014, 153,127km, which is merely inventory of documents, to be included in the amount of inventory error in the year 2015 and to be included in the amount of radio average pay in duplicate. Thus, the defendant is obligated to pay 24,420,306 won for the previous settlement of accounts plus 13,889,691 won for the amount of 153,127kg for the above 2015.

The written evidence No. 2, No. 2, and No. 27, and No. 30 may be recognized by considering the whole purport of the pleadings.