Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 2,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 500,000, respectively.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

From 13:00 on June 15, 2017 to 14:20 on the same day from 13:00 to 14:0 on the same day, the Defendants saw that: (a) a person who first pays three points pursuant to the pre-determined rules by using the 50 Chapter 50 of the Tincation; (b) a person who first pays 100 won to such person; and (c) a 15 additional 100 won for each additional point, the Defendants 294,000 won for E; (d) Defendant A 340,000 won for Defendant B; and (e) 1,000 won for Do Ga 1,000 won for Ga 635,000 won for Do Ga.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each protocol concerning the examination of suspect of the police against E or D;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to control sites and photographs of seized articles;

1. Relevant Article 246 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting a crime and Article 246 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the attraction of a workhouse;

1. Article 48 (1) of the Criminal Act for forfeiture;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of each of the instant gambling orders was that CCTV camera was installed outside the instant gambling place; Defendant A had been punished twice as a fine for gambling crime even in the past; Defendant B was first offender; Defendant B was first offender; the details of the instant crime; the circumstances before and after the instant crime; and other circumstances of the Defendants’ age, sex, environment, etc.