A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On February 2, 2018, the Defendant became aware of the victim C (the age of 17) who is a child or juvenile through the open hosting room B, which was a child or juvenile, in the middle of 2018.

1. The Defendant violated the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (sexual purchase, etc.) paid 100,000 won to the said victim as the price for sexual traffic at the guest room in which it is impossible to identify the number of the Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Diveel, on February 2, 2018.

As a result, the defendant was committing the act of purchasing child or juvenile sex.

2. No person who violates the Act on the Protection and Support of Missing Children, etc. shall protect such missing children, etc. without filing a report thereon with the chief of a police office without justifiable grounds;

Defendant

A. On May 12, 2018, around 19:30 on May 12, 2018, the victim sent from the first floor F convenience store of the building located in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, provided accommodation to the victim from the above temporary point to May 13, 2018, including: (a) the victim used the Defendant’s vehicle to the mutual incompeting telecom with each other in Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul; (b) the victim used the Defendant’s vehicle to have a sex relationship once with the victim; and (c) the victim returned to the Seoul Nowon-gu, Nowon-gu, Seoul; and

B. On May 21, 2018, around 15:30, the victim sent out before the exit No. H 9 located in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G, provided the victim with a view to getting him/her to receive medical treatment, and using the Defendant’s vehicle at the “L” restaurant located in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, while providing the victim with accommodation from the above date to May 24, 2018.

Accordingly, the defendant has protected missing children, etc. more than twice without justifiable reasons.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of the accused in the first protocol of trial;

1. Each police statement made to C (tentatively named);

1. A report on internal investigation (to attach records of profiling of missing children) and an investigation report (to attach text messages to father C of a suspect).