logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2012.10.08 2011고단1893
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Of the facts charged in the instant case, each fraud described in the crime sight table shall be acquitted.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 6, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to five years of imprisonment for fraud at the Daejeon District Court on May 6, 201 and the said judgment became final and conclusive on the 14th of the same month.

After establishing a mutual distribution company of the Dong-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City C Co., Ltd., the Defendant was supplied with goods from manufacturers of the agricultural and fishery products and sold them by dumping, and conspired with D, one-person E to commit the crime of acquiring the goods by means of closing the door of the distribution company, and then planned to acquire them by deceiving the goods as if the victims were to have no intent or ability to pay the price even if the goods were supplied by the victims.

(1) On November 2008, the Defendant, in collusion with D and D, one of the co-offenders, called “E,” and called “the Defendant’s phone call to the victim G, who operated a distribution company in the name of Young-gun F, Young-gun, Young-gun, Young-gun, who was an accomplice, called “in the middle of a meeting, the Defendant ordered 1,200 knife 1,200 knife, at the 2,500 knife level per 12,00 won per hour at the face of 12 knife. to customers.”

On November 5, 2008, the Defendant, etc. entered into a contract for supply of goods with the victim to pay the remainder of the balance on November 20, 2008 by paying 20% of the down payment at the above (C) office, and delivering 1,200 bits at risk of 2,500 to the warehouse located in Ha, Youngnam-gun, Youngnam-gun, for a storage.

However, the defendant et al. did not have the intention or ability to pay the purchase price even if the defendant et al. purchased the sculatory and high language from the victim.

Nevertheless, on November 14, 2008, the Defendant et al. obtained from the victim the supply of 124,000,000 square meters and cryms and cryms, and acquired them by fraud.

(2) On November 3, 2008, the Defendant, in collusion with D and SE, who is an accomplice, should post a telephone to the victim J, who operates a distribution company of stoed fish in the trade name of Naju City I, thereby making it appropriate for the Defendant to do so.

arrow