1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: (a) the second instance court's 10, first instance court's 1, 19, and 6, second instance court's 9, and first instance court's 10, and second instance court's 8th instance court's 10, second instance court's 10, second instance court's 9, and second instance court's 10, second instance court's 10, second instance court's 9, and second instance court's 10, second instance court's 8th instance court's 8th instance court's 2th instance court's 5th instance court's 5th instance court's 6th

【Additional Part 5 【(5) The Defendant asserts to the effect that, at the beginning of 2000, the bridge itself was not included in the guidelines for the installation and management of road safety facilities at the time of the completion of the 2000 Jeju Jeju Jeju Jeju Jeju Jeju Jeju District, the cases of the installation of the bridge section were added to the above guidelines, and that, at the time of the amendment of the established regulations, the above guidelines provide that “construction works and design services already implemented at the time of the partial amendment of the guidelines for the installation and management of the road safety facilities may be used as they are if deemed necessary by the head of the agency awarding the order, the previous standards may not be deemed as any defects in the installation and management of the bridge section at the time of the accident site, which are the 200th anniversary of the construction of the bridge section at the time of the 2000 Jeju Jeju Jeju District.” Therefore, the Ministry of Health and Welfare revised the guidelines for the installation and management of the bridge section at the 200th 10th 201.