A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 18, 2015, the Defendant: (a) was in front of a building used by the victim C in both weeks as a residence around the late night of February 18, 2015 by both weeks; (b) the victim was released from the glass door, and intruded into the glass door; and (c) the victim was not found to have discovered any stolen object.

Accordingly, the defendant attempted to steals another's property by destroying a part of a structure at night and impairing the structure, but attempted to do so.

2. On February 28, 2015, the Defendant was in the same place as around 23:00, and around 1, 2015, the Defendant: (a) went into the wooden fish, and opened the window of the household building formed by the panel and opened it into the site; (b) 2 beer and beer, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, and 1, etc. in the market price owned by the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen another's property by impairing a structure that people use as a residence at night.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. C’s statement;

1. Report on investigation (specific suspect), fingerprint appraisal results at the scene of the crime, confirmation of identity of the thief;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Articles 342, 331(1) (a) (a special thief) of the Criminal Act and Article 330 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense (a crime committed by intrusion upon a structure at night);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. In light of the method and risk of the instant crime on the grounds of sentencing under Article 53 and Article 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for mitigation of volume, the nature of the crime is not good, and the Defendant’s liability for the crime is not exceptionally agreed upon with the victim.

However, the fact that the defendant led to the confession of each of the crimes in this case by the investigative agency, there is no record of punishment for the same crime, and the amount of damage is not significant.