The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

1. The sentence of the lower court (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. We examine ex officio prior to the judgment on the grounds for appeal.

In the trial of the party, the prosecutor is 1.C. of the facts charged in this case.

The second sentence of this article, "The defendant, which is a private document to prove the facts for the purpose of exercising, forged the identification of flagrant offenders under F, the identification of arrested suspects, the identification of the principal driver, the identification report of the state driver, the statement of the situation of the state of the occurrence of the traffic accident, and submitted it as if they were duly constituted.

“For the purpose of exercising this, the Defendant forged the F F’s identification certificate of a flagrant offender under the name of F, which is a private document on the proof of fact, the arrested suspect’s physical confirmation certificate, and the statement of the occurrence of a traffic accident, respectively; forged F’s signature in the primary driver detection report and the statement of the situation of the traffic accident; and submitted the said private document and signature as if they were duly formed.

“Application for Amendments to Bill of Indictment was filed,” and since the subject of the adjudication was changed by this court’s permission, the judgment of the court below was no longer maintained.

3. Thus, the court below's decision is reversed pursuant to Article 364 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Act without examining the defendant's unfair argument of sentencing, and it is again decided as follows after pleading.

Criminal facts

The summary of the facts charged by the court and the summary of the evidence are as follows: 4 and 5 of the judgment of the court below among the facts constituting the crime of the court below. "The execution of the sentence was terminated," which was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, etc. on June 2, 2016, and the judgment became final and conclusive on December 5, 2016.

“The execution of the sentence has been terminated.”

[See Supreme Court Decision 2014Do469 Decided March 27, 2014, see Supreme Court Decision 2014Do469 Decided March 27, 201. “C.”