1. The Defendant’s decision to appoint C, D, E, F, G, H, and I as a school juristic person’s temporary directors on February 14, 2018 shall be revoked.

2...

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The school juristic person J’s internal examination and temporary directors system 1) the school juristic person J(hereinafter “J”)

On January 18, 1964, L University, M University, six special schools, and two kindergartens, etc. were established and operated by the network K. Around 1993, there was a dispute between members of L University and P (O and N) in relation to the appointment of the president of L University. (2) On February 22, 1994, the Defendant revoked the approval of the appointment of the director and appointed a provisional director. (3)

The defendant has replaced the temporary directors whose term has expired as new temporary directors.

B. On November 1, 2011, the Private School Dispute Mediation Committee decided to appoint the Plaintiffs, Q (N), P, R (P), and S (Defendant Recommendation) as a regular director, and to appoint T as a temporary director. Accordingly, the Defendant appointed a regular director (term: from November 1, 201 to October 31, 2015) and a temporary director. 2) The Defendant appointed a temporary director on November 8, 201, following a resolution by the Private School Dispute Mediation Committee (the term of office of the temporary director expires: November 1, 201 to October 31, 2015).

[U] A disposition to appoint ad hoc director was revoked on the ground that the grounds for appointing ad hoc director against J were eliminated (Seoul Administrative Court 2012Guhap43246, Seoul High Court 2013Nu15912). The director S died on December 30, 2012.

C. On March 14, 2014, the Defendant’s disposition to revoke the Defendant’s approval of taking office and the lawsuit seeking revocation thereof (hereinafter “Plaintiff, etc.”) on the ground that “A dispute between executives may seriously obstruct the operation of a school, seriously interfere with the appointment of a vacant officer, appointment of a head of a school who is not appointed, appointment of a head of a school who has been established and operated, and a temporary director’s non-recommended of a candidate for temporary directors whose term of office expires, and non-recommended of a school that has been established and operated.”

(2) The Plaintiff et al. revoked the approval of taking office of the Plaintiff et al. against the Plaintiff et al.