1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

The court's explanation of this case is the same as the part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance in addition to adding the following contents to the fourth tenth of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, the court's explanation of this case is accepted by Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

In addition, (C) at the time of refugee interview, the Plaintiff stated, “(C)” that “The Plaintiff’s parents intending to kill or kill the Plaintiff’s parents who want to go away from the Plaintiff’s miscarriage that the Plaintiff’s parents had left. It is another reason for the Plaintiff to go back to his own country even if the Plaintiff’s father’s threat to have his own property deducted is another reason.” In addition to the above statement at the time of refugee interview, the Plaintiff’s wife’s recent statement was “In addition, there was a great concern that the Plaintiff would be threatened with the Plaintiff’s life. If the Plaintiff would return to his own country, the Plaintiff should be recognized as a refugee.” However, the Plaintiff’s above assertion is that “The Plaintiff’s aforementioned assertion is likely to be killed from the Plaintiff’s heir who would be deprived of his/her inherited property,” and that it constitutes a dispute between the Plaintiff and his/her family members, and thus, it is difficult to conclude that the Plaintiff’s appeal constitutes a dispute between the Plaintiff and his/her family members and thus, it constitutes a justifiable ground for the Plaintiff’s appeal.”