logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2013.10.31 2013노2810
사기
Text

The judgment below

The part concerning the first crime shall be reversed in the judgment.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

except that this judgment.

Reasons

1. The defendant asserts that the summary of the grounds for appeal is improper because the sentence of the lower court (the first offense: imprisonment with prison labor for 4 months, and the second offense: the fine of 1 million won) is too unreasonable.

(Supplementary Defendant did not submit the statement of reasons for appeal that the period for submitting the statement of reasons for appeal does not require the submission of the statement of reasons for appeal. However, according to the records, the Defendant appears to have received the notification of the receipt of the trial when it lacks the ability to separate the victim due to brain cerebrovascular surgery, etc., and the Defendant does not reject the dismissal decision. 2.1.1.1.3.11.11.2.2.11, the Defendant recognized the entirety of the crimes (in the original trial, the rejection of the part regarding the victimD) when the Defendant was in the trial, and recognized his mistake (the rejection of the part concerning the victimD in the original trial). The part concerning the crime No. 1 of the judgment against the victim D in the judgment of the court below should consider the case with the crime of fraud and equality. It appears that the victim C did not want to be punished against the Defendant any further, and it appears that the victim C paid all damages caused by the crime of this case to the victim, immediately after being detained by the court below, and the defendant's health conditions are not good.

3. The part concerning the first crime in the judgment of the court below in accordance with Article 364(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act is reversed, and the second crime in the judgment of the court below is to be judged as follows. The second crime in the judgment of the court below is justified.

arrow