beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 77,00,000 as well as 6% per annum from May 24, 2018 to November 28, 2019, and the following.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. On February 3, 2017, the Defendant was awarded a contract for a new construction project in Gansi-si District D (hereinafter “instant construction project”) with C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “C”) for the construction cost of KRW 16.5 billion and the construction period from March 1, 2017 to May 31, 2018.
-on-site name: ACT SYESM design and technical advice - Site location: - contract amount: from the date of the contract to the date of completion of the pel and steel framed construction: - contract amount: KRW 700,000 (including value added tax) in accordance with the terms and conditions of the payment of technical advisory fees under Article 4 of the General Terms and Conditions of the Contract - KRW 30,000,000 for the first payment of technical advisory fees under Article 4 of the General Terms and Conditions of the Contract - KRW 10,000 for the book delivery, KRW 10,000,000 for the second payment for the book delivery, KRW 10,000 for the second payment for the first half payment for the book delivery, KRW 40,000,000 for the second half shipbuilding work, KRW 50,000,000 for the last 3 Section.
B. On April 14, 2017, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with the Defendant to carry out a design and technical advisory agreement (hereinafter “instant contract”).
The main contents of the instant technical advisory agreement are as follows.
C. The design of ACT SYSM that the Plaintiff offered to the Defendant is using the “ACT AT AU method” (hereinafter “the instant construction method”). The construction method is a construction method that puts steel, beams, connecting materials, etc. in a quantity less than that ordinarily invested in general reinforced concrete and steel framed construction, and has the effect of reducing construction cost and reducing air.
After the conclusion of the instant contract, the Plaintiff completed the structural design of the absence of columns and the absence of beams, and supplied the Defendant with the structural design.
E. The Defendant subcontracted the steel frame construction among the instant construction works to F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “F”).
The plaintiff on 2018.